Could These Safety Improvements Make Denver Truck Crashes Less Likely?
Motorists throughout Denver, Greenwood Village and Steamboat Springs Colorado are at risk of being hurt or even killed if truckers do not take safety seriously. Unfortunately, truck safety laws are lacking in some important areas. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)has indicated that it hopes to change that. A truck accident lawyer knows that new safety rules could make a big difference in reducing truck accident risks and saving lives, so hopefully the NTSB will be successful at implementing new and more effective regulations.
NTSB Aims to Improve Truck Safety
The NTSB makes a list each year of the “Most Wanted” policies and actions that that agency believes need safety improvements. This list sets the road map for the upcoming year for the NTSB, and the NTSB hopes that legislators and policymakers will also consider the suggested list of improvements and modifications.
The NTSB board member who has been nominated to be the board’s new chairman believes that it is important to approach improvements to truck safety by incorporating a “broad spectrum” of policies that include things like making sure drivers are fit to drive, as well as improving vehicle maintenance rules and regulations. New safety technologies in trucks is also a top priority.
Although the NTSB has mentioned things like imposing stricter rules for checking if truckers are medically fit for driving, there are plenty of other proposals that the agency may wish to consider if it is serious about truck safety. Tire Business reports on some recommendations that the American Trucking Association (ATA) made recently to a Senate subcommittee on improving truck safety.
The ATA’s suggestions for new safety regulations that it has urged the government to consider include:
Requiring that all trucks use speed-limiters.
Shifting the focus from the current model of inspecting vehicles on the roadside to ensure rules are being followed to instead focusing on enforcing driver behavior and on-road traffic rules.
Putting incentives in place for the use of various crash avoidance technologies like forward collision warning systems that alert drivers to impending obstacles, or lane departure warning systems that let drivers know they’ve veered out of their lane.
Creating a strong mandate for the use of electronic devices to log trucker hours.
Developing new training rules and protocols that are less focused on the number of hours that a trucker has driven and more focused on making sure that they test comprehension and performance.
Reworking the Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) system so that the system can be more effectively focused on carriers that are considered high risk.
Congressional monitoring of studies that are going on right now to determine the impact of changes to the hours-of-service rules. Some of the hours-or-service rules have been suspended by congressional amendment, including a requirement for overnight rest periods between 1:00 and 5:00 am. These studies would assess the impact of the suspended rules.
It remains to be seen whether the NTSB will move forward with broader safety efforts or whether congress will take the recommendations of the American Trucking Association to try to improve safety.
Contact Bell & Pollock at (877) 744-5900 to schedule a consultation with a personal injury lawyer in Denver, Greenwood Village and Steamboat Springs Colorado.
Call a trusted attorney at Bell & Pollock, P.C. at (303) 795-5900 to get on the road to recovery now. You can also email our firm via the contact firm on this page.
As proud champions of the people, our lawyers are ready to answer your questions, explain the law and your rights, and help you take whatever steps necessary to recover the compensation you’re entitled to. With us in your corner, you can be confident that you have the legal support and representation necessary to successfully resolve your claim.
Don’t delay your recovery for a second longer – and don’t be misguided into thinking that you have to go through the process alone. Our attorneys are here, ready to help – and you won’t have to pay us anything until (or unless) there is a recovery in your case.
Free Legal E-Books
Click on any one of the e-books to access your free copy!
WE KNOW HOW TO WIN
CASE: Client was injured by a drunk driver. As a result of the motor vehicle accident, client was rendered a quadriplegic and needed a life care plan. Outcome: $9,600,000
CASE: Against Insurance company for failure to pay for property damage after a gas and fire explosion. Outcome: $1,600,000
CASE: Medical malpractice for failure to diagnose a descending aorta aneurism, resulting in death. Outcome: $1,300,000
CASE: Neck and back injuries from car accident. Client had ongoing symptoms and needed injections for attempted remediation of pain. Settled for $485,000
CASE: Client was injured in a 2 vehicle collision. She suffered a traumatic brain injury, concussion and multiple injuries to the neck. Outcome: $6,000,000
CASE: Client was in her car and was T-Boned by a commercial vehicle. Her cerebral spinal fluid leaked and she suffered a concussion and traumatic brain injury with neck and lumbar (low back) injuries. Her neck injury caused radiating pain, numbness and tingling in her arms. Outcome: $3,400,000
CASE: Client was driving on a rural road when another car crossed the center line and caused a head-on collision in the snow and ice. Client did physical work for a living. Both knees were injured, along with a neck injury. Outcome: $2,300,000
CASE: Client was driving on South Parker road when another vehicle rapidly changed lanes and rear-ended the client. That vehicle was cited for careless driving. The collision caused a concussion with traumatic brain Injury. Client missed time from work and had a positive correlation between brain scan and neuropsychological test results. Outcome: $950,000
CASE: Client was rear ended by a dump truck, was then knocked forward and hit another vehicle. Client had a concussion with traumatic brain injury. Client underwent a brain scan which showed hypoperfusion, correlated with her concussion symptoms. Client suffered neck injuries and injuries to her low back. Outcome: $650,000
CASE: Client was rear-ended. The mechanism of injury from the forces in the collision caused her neck injury and at the same time, damaged her organs inside her throat. Client had swallowing and choking issues. Outcome: $1,250,000
CASE: Client was in a motor vehicle accident. Both injections in the neck rendered some temporary relief. The Injections were transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Surgery was recommended on the lumbar (low back). The low back was injured by the forces in the collisions. Outcome: $933,000
CASE: The client was driving in her car and was rear-ended thereby causing injuries to her lower back and neck. Client also suffered a concussion. Client had to undergo facet inj