Truck accidents cause more than 5,000 fatalities and 150,000 injuries over the course of the year, according to Safe Roads. The majority of people who lose their lives in truck accidents are not in the truck, but are in passenger vehicles or are walking, bicycling or riding a motorcycle. Unfortunately, as many as 750 of the deaths and 20,000 of the injuries happen as a result of collisions caused by fatigued commercial drivers.
A truck accident lawyer knows the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration has set strict regulations designed to limit the number of hours that truckers can drive. These regulations exist because truck drivers face immense pressure to continue to drive even when they have become too fatigued to be safe behind the wheel. Now, there are efforts being made by some senators to roll back the stricter FMCSA regulations that went into effect last year. The public, however, is not in favor of allowing truckers to spend more hours on the road.
Survey Shows that Motorists Worry about Tired Truckers
When the FMCSA changed the rules for trucker hours and limited the number of hours a trucker could drive to 70 per week, this led to outcry from some professional trucking associations and drivers. The biggest complaint was the new rules were too restrictive, as they require a rest break after the 70-hour threshold is met that encompasses two overnight periods between 1:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. The argument is this leads to more truck drivers on the roads during high traffic times.
One senator is pushing for a change to the FMCSA rules, according to The Hill. She has made an amendment to the Senate appropriations bill that would increase the number of hours a trucker can be on the road to 82 per week, up from the current 70. Other senators do not agree this change should be made, and have put forth their own amendments to keep the limit where the FMCSA set it.
As lawmakers wrangle over the parameters of these limits, the Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety and the Truck Safety Coalition polled the public to see what they thought. The results were overwhelming: Around 80 percent of people asked were concerned about the dangers that tired truckers could present on the roads and were not in support of allowing truckers to drive for longer hours before resting.
A former NHTSA administrator is concerned that when trucking companies are given more leeway to push drivers to go for longer periods of time, trucks will effectively turn into “sweatshops on wheels.” This is a big problem because when a trucker is overtired, he can experience the same delayed reaction time and impaired reactions as someone who has consumed alcohol.
While the disagreement over trucker hours is likely to continue, it is clear truck drivers should always make the responsible choice and avoid getting behind the wheel when they feel too exhausted to be the best drivers they can be. Truck carriers need to be reminded to put people before profits.
Contact Bell & Pollock at (877) 744-5900 to schedule a consultation with a truck accident lawyer in Denver, Greenwood Village and Steamboat Springs Colorado.
Call a trusted attorney at Bell & Pollock, P.C. at (303) 795-5900 to get on the road to recovery now. You can also email our firm via the contact firm on this page.
As proud champions of the people, our lawyers are ready to answer your questions, explain the law and your rights, and help you take whatever steps necessary to recover the compensation you’re entitled to. With us in your corner, you can be confident that you have the legal support and representation necessary to successfully resolve your claim.
Don’t delay your recovery for a second longer – and don’t be misguided into thinking that you have to go through the process alone. Our attorneys are here, ready to help – and you won’t have to pay us anything until (or unless) there is a recovery in your case.
Free Legal E-Books
Click on any one of the e-books to access your free copy!
WE KNOW HOW TO WIN
CASE: Client was injured by a drunk driver. As a result of the motor vehicle accident, client was rendered a quadriplegic and needed a life care plan. Outcome: $9,600,000
CASE: Against Insurance company for failure to pay for property damage after a gas and fire explosion. Outcome: $1,600,000
CASE: Medical malpractice for failure to diagnose a descending aorta aneurism, resulting in death. Outcome: $1,300,000
CASE: Neck and back injuries from car accident. Client had ongoing symptoms and needed injections for attempted remediation of pain. Settled for $485,000
CASE: Client was injured in a 2 vehicle collision. She suffered a traumatic brain injury, concussion and multiple injuries to the neck. Outcome: $6,000,000
CASE: Client was in her car and was T-Boned by a commercial vehicle. Her cerebral spinal fluid leaked and she suffered a concussion and traumatic brain injury with neck and lumbar (low back) injuries. Her neck injury caused radiating pain, numbness and tingling in her arms. Outcome: $3,400,000
CASE: Client was driving on a rural road when another car crossed the center line and caused a head-on collision in the snow and ice. Client did physical work for a living. Both knees were injured, along with a neck injury. Outcome: $2,300,000
CASE: Client was driving on South Parker road when another vehicle rapidly changed lanes and rear-ended the client. That vehicle was cited for careless driving. The collision caused a concussion with traumatic brain Injury. Client missed time from work and had a positive correlation between brain scan and neuropsychological test results. Outcome: $950,000
CASE: Client was rear ended by a dump truck, was then knocked forward and hit another vehicle. Client had a concussion with traumatic brain injury. Client underwent a brain scan which showed hypoperfusion, correlated with her concussion symptoms. Client suffered neck injuries and injuries to her low back. Outcome: $650,000
CASE: Client was rear-ended. The mechanism of injury from the forces in the collision caused her neck injury and at the same time, damaged her organs inside her throat. Client had swallowing and choking issues. Outcome: $1,250,000
CASE: Client was in a motor vehicle accident. Both injections in the neck rendered some temporary relief. The Injections were transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Surgery was recommended on the lumbar (low back). The low back was injured by the forces in the collisions. Outcome: $933,000
CASE: The client was driving in her car and was rear-ended thereby causing injuries to her lower back and neck. Client also suffered a concussion. Client had to undergo facet injections multiple times, through multiple procedures. Client also had cognitive issues which required cognitive training and therapy. Outcome: $400,000
CASE: Client was entering a highway from an on ramp and was rear-ended by a commercial van. Client tested positive for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome and failed conservative treatment. Client underwent thoracic outlet syndrome surgey, which involved removal of the first rib to attempt to relieve pressure in the thoracic outlet. Client also suffered a back injury. Outcome: $750,000
CASE: Client was injured by a drunk driver, who crossed the center line of the road. Client underwent multiple surgeries and could not work. Client was late 40s and needed a modified life care plan. Outcome: $750,000