Denver DUI Accidents a Top Concern of Law Enforcement
In the United States, an alcohol-related traffic accident causes one injury every two minutes and one death every eight minutes. In Colorado alone, 133 people were killed in alcohol-impaired crashes in 2012 according to the NHTSA.While there was a significant decline in drunk driving deaths in the 1980s and 1990s, there are still far too many fatalities each year.
Efforts are ongoing by experts to try to reduce the injuries and deaths, and these efforts are largely supported by the public. In fact, according to the National Safety Council, three out of every four Americans endorse imposing more severe penalties on intoxicated motorists in order to make the roads safer.
The NSC has summarized some of the top strategies to reduce impaired driving, but ultimately the decision rests with each individual motorist to make the smart choice and avoid putting his own life and the lives of others at risk. Victims of drunk driving accidents can get help from a drunk driving accident attorney in Denver in securing compensation for their losses caused by the accident, but preventing accidents by just saying no to drunk driving is a far better option for everyone.
Reducing Drunk Driving Dangers
Some of the different techniques the NSC describes among the top strategies to reduce impaired driving include:
Screening and brief intervention (SBI): Screening and brief interventions are provided by employers, usually because the employers have workers who drive regularly in the course of duty. Employers have incentive to reduce the risk of drunk driving so they can protect themselves from liability if an employee gets into an accident while drunk. Employers can also offer screening and brief intervention programs as part of Employee Assistance Programs or employee health benefits. Screening and brief intervention has been found in numerous studies to be the most cost-effective strategy to reduce problem-drinking behaviors and to help facilitate effective treatment for people with drinking problems.
The raised drinking age: When the drinking age was raised to 21, crashes declined by as much as 30 percent. As many as 25,000 traffic accidents involving drunk teens have been prevented and while 56 percent of teen drivers killed in accidents had a BAC above the legal limit in 1982, only 23 percent of teen car crash victims had a BAC over the limit in 2005.
High visibility enforcement. Public service campaigns, like those that that typically go into high gear around the holiday times, have a major impact on reducing the number of intoxicated drivers. Television ads and media material informing the public of the consequences of drunk driving can reduce the likelihood that people will get behind the wheel drunk.
Sobriety checkpoints: Sobriety checkpoints are helpful for reducing the drunk driving risk for a number of different reasons. For example, sobriety checkpoints make the enforcement of drunk driving laws very visible to the public, thus acting as a deterrent. Sobriety checkpoints can also help police to catch drunk drivers in the act before the motorists get into a crash. Research has indicated that sobriety checkpoints may decrease the risk of drunk driving by as much as 20 percent.
Fortunately, these programs have made a major difference in reducing drunk driving. Ignition Interlock devices have also helped to significantly reduce the risk of crashes since as many as a third of all drunk driving arrests annually are caused by repeat offenders. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is currently recommending that IIDs be required for all convicted offenders, even those convicted of a first DUI. This could help improve road safety.
Bell & Pollock has offices in Denver, CO. Call 800-559-5920 today to schedule a free consultation.
Call a trusted attorney at Bell & Pollock, P.C. at (303) 795-5900 to get on the road to recovery now. You can also email our firm via the contact firm on this page.
As proud champions of the people, our lawyers are ready to answer your questions, explain the law and your rights, and help you take whatever steps necessary to recover the compensation you’re entitled to. With us in your corner, you can be confident that you have the legal support and representation necessary to successfully resolve your claim.
Don’t delay your recovery for a second longer – and don’t be misguided into thinking that you have to go through the process alone. Our attorneys are here, ready to help – and you won’t have to pay us anything until (or unless) there is a recovery in your case.
Free Legal E-Books
Click on any one of the e-books to access your free copy!
WE KNOW HOW TO WIN
CASE: Client was injured by a drunk driver. As a result of the motor vehicle accident, client was rendered a quadriplegic and needed a life care plan. Outcome: $9,600,000
CASE: Against Insurance company for failure to pay for property damage after a gas and fire explosion. Outcome: $1,600,000
CASE: Medical malpractice for failure to diagnose a descending aorta aneurism, resulting in death. Outcome: $1,300,000
CASE: Neck and back injuries from car accident. Client had ongoing symptoms and needed injections for attempted remediation of pain. Settled for $485,000
CASE: Client was injured in a 2 vehicle collision. She suffered a traumatic brain injury, concussion and multiple injuries to the neck. Outcome: $6,000,000
CASE: Client was in her car and was T-Boned by a commercial vehicle. Her cerebral spinal fluid leaked and she suffered a concussion and traumatic brain injury with neck and lumbar (low back) injuries. Her neck injury caused radiating pain, numbness and tingling in her arms. Outcome: $3,400,000
CASE: Client was driving on a rural road when another car crossed the center line and caused a head-on collision in the snow and ice. Client did physical work for a living. Both knees were injured, along with a neck injury. Outcome: $2,300,000
CASE: Client was driving on South Parker road when another vehicle rapidly changed lanes and rear-ended the client. That vehicle was cited for careless driving. The collision caused a concussion with traumatic brain Injury. Client missed time from work and had a positive correlation between brain scan and neuropsychological test results. Outcome: $950,000
CASE: Client was rear ended by a dump truck, was then knocked forward and hit another vehicle. Client had a concussion with traumatic brain injury. Client underwent a brain scan which showed hypoperfusion, correlated with her concussion symptoms. Client suffered neck injuries and injuries to her low back. Outcome: $650,000
CASE: Client was rear-ended. The mechanism of injury from the forces in the collision caused her neck injury and at the same time, damaged her organs inside her throat. Client had swallowing and choking issues. Outcome: $1,250,000
CASE: Client was in a motor vehicle accident. Both injections in the neck rendered some temporary relief. The Injections were transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Surgery was recommended on the lumbar (low back). The low back was injured by the forces in the collisions. Outcome: $933,000
CASE: The client was driving in her car and was rear-ended thereby causing injuries to her lower back and neck. Client also suffered a concussion. Client had to undergo facet injections multiple times, through multiple procedures. Client also had cognitive issues which required cognitive training and therapy. Outcome: $400,000
CASE: Client was entering a highway from an on ramp and was rear-ended by a commercial van. Client tested positive for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome and failed conser