A disastrous nursing home fire has made headlines in recent weeks, as 22 seniors are missing and presumed dead after the blaze. The fire destroyed an elderly living community and has caused at least 10 confirmed deaths already.  Frigid temperatures have complicated the search for the missing seniors.

Denver Nursing Home Neglect & Importance of Disaster PlanningThe devastating fire underscores the importance of having a disaster plan in place. Unfortunately, many nursing homes are simply not prepared to react appropriately in emergencies.  The Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has revealed that most nursing homes are inadequately prepared for disaster and have failed to take steps recommended by experts to keep residents safe.

Nursing homes have an obligation to patients to ensure they are following recommended safety guidelines.  These homes are entrusted with the care of vulnerable seniors and can be held responsible for injuries that result from either abuse or neglect.  A personal injury lawyer in Denver can help victims or families who suspect a nursing home has failed to live up to its obligations, so call Bell & Pollock today to speak to a legal professional.

Nursing Homes Not Prepared for Disaster 

To assess the readiness of senior communities for disasters, data was reviewed from 2007 to 2010.  The data demonstrated that nursing homes failed to address several recommended issues that experts identified as essential to disaster preparedness including:

  • Establishing reliable transportation contracts.
  • Having a plan in place for ready collaboration with emergency management.
  • Prevention of resident health problems following a disaster.
  • Facilitating contact with long-term care ombudsmen both during and after the disaster so residents can get necessary support.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service (CMS) has issued guidance checklists that facilities can consult to create an effective emergency-management plan. Completing the checklist items will address these and other lapses in safety procedures.

CMS also plans to revise federal regulations following the report on nursing home preparedness.  CMS will be including specific requirements for emergency plans and staff training, and will be updating the State Operations Manual to provide more detailed guidance on nursing home obligations.  Model policies and procedures are also being developed for long-term care ombudsmen to make it easier to provide essential support to patients.

The Colorado State legislature could also consider imposing specific requirements on senior homes to prepare for blizzards, fires and other emergencies that could affect senior care facilities within the state.  Just last year, Senate Bill 13-111 addressed the issue of reporting elder mistreatment in order to improve safety conditions for seniors. The new law was based on the recommendation of the Abuse Task Force, and intended to address the problem that Colorado was just one of only three states that did not mandate reporting of suspected elder mistreatment.

Since Colorado is actively taking steps to reduce risks for seniors, establishing state guidelines for emergency preparedness would be one more step in the right direction.  Nursing home residents and family members who suffer harm because of the negligence of a nursing home when it comes to disaster prep can also pursue a civil lawsuit to recover compensation for damages.

Contact Bell & Pollock at (877) 744-5900 or visit www.bellpollockinjury.com to schedule a consultation with a personal injury lawyer in Denver.

Contact Us

Call a trusted attorney at Bell & Pollock, P.C. at (303) 795-5900 to get on the road to recovery now. You can also email our firm via the contact firm on this page.

As proud champions of the people, our lawyers are ready to answer your questions, explain the law and your rights, and help you take whatever steps necessary to recover the compensation you’re entitled to. With us in your corner, you can be confident that you have the legal support and representation necessary to successfully resolve your claim.

Don’t delay your recovery for a second longer – and don’t be misguided into thinking that you have to go through the process alone. Our attorneys are here, ready to help – and you won’t have to pay us anything until (or unless) there is a recovery in your case.

You may confidentially submit your question and it will be answered by Bell & Pollock, P.C. The only little catch is that he does this as a public service and he's going to give you some general advice only. This does not make you a client of Bell & Pollock, P.C. There is no charge for this service.
 
 
captcha

Free Legal E-Books

Click on any one of the e-books to access your free copy!

Case Results

WE KNOW HOW TO WIN

CASE: Client was injured by a drunk driver. As a result of the motor vehicle accident, client was rendered a quadriplegic and needed a life care plan.
Outcome: $9,600,000

CASE: Against Insurance company for failure to pay for property damage after a gas and fire explosion.
Outcome: $1,600,000

CASE: Medical malpractice for failure to diagnose a descending aorta aneurism, resulting in death.
Outcome: $1,300,000

CASE: Neck and back injuries from car accident. Client had ongoing symptoms and needed injections for attempted remediation of pain.
Settled for $485,000

CASE: Client was injured in a 2 vehicle collision. She suffered a traumatic brain injury, concussion and multiple injuries to the neck.
Outcome: $6,000,000

CASE: Client was in her car and was T-Boned by a commercial vehicle. Her cerebral spinal fluid leaked and she suffered a concussion and traumatic brain injury with neck and lumbar (low back) injuries. Her neck injury caused radiating pain, numbness and tingling in her arms.
Outcome: $3,400,000

CASE: Client was driving on a rural road when another car crossed the center line and caused a head-on collision in the snow and ice. Client did physical work for a living. Both knees were injured, along with a neck injury.
Outcome: $2,300,000

CASE: Client was driving on South Parker road when another vehicle rapidly changed lanes and rear-ended the client. That vehicle was cited for careless driving. The collision caused a concussion with traumatic brain Injury. Client missed time from work and had a positive correlation between brain scan and neuropsychological test results.
Outcome: $950,000

CASE: Client was rear ended by a dump truck, was then knocked forward and hit another vehicle. Client had a concussion with traumatic brain injury. Client underwent a brain scan which showed hypoperfusion, correlated with her concussion symptoms. Client suffered neck injuries and injuries to her low back.
Outcome: $650,000

CASE: Client was rear-ended. The mechanism of injury from the forces in the collision caused her neck injury and at the same time, damaged her organs inside her throat. Client had swallowing and choking issues.
Outcome: $1,250,000

CASE: Client was in a motor vehicle accident. Both injections in the neck rendered some temporary relief. The Injections were transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Surgery was recommended on the lumbar (low back). The low back was injured by the forces in the collisions.
Outcome: $933,000

CASE: The client was driving in her car and was rear-ended thereby causing injuries to her lower back and neck. Client also suffered