n the United States, much of the focus on improving motor vehicle safety is centered around improving technology. Self-driving cars are just the latest in a long line of efforts to automate the process of driving, put responsibility on technology to make smart choices, and reduce the danger that human error can cause.

Is Government Telling the Whole Story on Motor Vehicle Collisions?

Recently, however, an article on USA Today questioned whether the focus on vehicle safety technology has really been the best way to improve conditions and make the roads safer. A personal injury lawyer knows that seat belts, airbags and other safety devices go a long way towards preventing injury when an accident happens. However, perhaps fewer people would die in motor vehicle collisions if US regulatory authorities stopped focusing so much on improving safety technology and instead more efforts were made to change driver behavior to avoid accidents in the first place.

Government Too Focused on Safety Technology & Not Enough on Safe Driving

On the website of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, recent news stories include:

  • A notice of proposed rule-making on communications technology that would allow communication from one vehicle to another.
  • News on advanced frontal air bags and on air bag inflators.
  • Details on tools to increase car seat safety.
  • Information on a new website tool to detect if a vehicle has been recalled.

While the NHTSA also has some information on safety tips for reducing the risk of accidents, such as bicycle safety advice, one of the primary focuses of this agency is on technological tools that help to protect people when an accident happens.

Unfortunately, as USA Today indicates, a “hyper-focus” on technology, especially “mandatory improvements designed to mitigate harm after a crash occurs” has not been as effective as the efforts in other countries that are much more focused on actually changing the behavior of motorists. This is especially true when vehicle technologies fail.

In the United States, for example, there has been a 41 percent decline in motor vehicle collision deaths since 1972 when the U.S. recorded the highest number of road traffic deaths. The Netherlands also recorded its highest number of road traffic deaths that same year. In the Netherlands, however, there was an 81 percent decline in traffic fatalities. This is more than double the decline experienced in the United States. Germany also had a 40 percent decline in traffic deaths, while Great Britain had a 76 percent reduction in the number of people dying in collisions.

When comparing the U.S. with other countries, there were 25 other locations that had a greater reduction in traffic deaths. If the U.S. had matched the declines in the seven countries with the biggest reduction in fatalities, 20,000 fewer Americans would have lost their lives in 2011, including three children under the age of eight.

Other countries that had more success in reducing collisions focused not on technology that reduced injuries in crashes, but instead using techniques like red light cameras, radar-speed detectors and enforcing strict laws against driver behaviors such as driving while distracted. The data shows this has been more effective, and the U.S. should consider changing its approach.

Contact Bell & Pollock at (877) 744-5900 to schedule a consultation with a personal injury lawyer in Denver, Greenwood Village and Steamboat Springs Colorado. 

Contact Us

Call a trusted attorney at Bell & Pollock, P.C. at (303) 795-5900 to get on the road to recovery now. You can also email our firm via the contact firm on this page.

As proud champions of the people, our lawyers are ready to answer your questions, explain the law and your rights, and help you take whatever steps necessary to recover the compensation you’re entitled to. With us in your corner, you can be confident that you have the legal support and representation necessary to successfully resolve your claim.

Don’t delay your recovery for a second longer – and don’t be misguided into thinking that you have to go through the process alone. Our attorneys are here, ready to help – and you won’t have to pay us anything until (or unless) there is a recovery in your case.

You may confidentially submit your question and it will be answered by Bell & Pollock, P.C. The only little catch is that he does this as a public service and he's going to give you some general advice only. This does not make you a client of Bell & Pollock, P.C. There is no charge for this service.
 
 
captcha

Free Legal E-Books

Click on any one of the e-books to access your free copy!

Case Results

WE KNOW HOW TO WIN

CASE: Client was injured by a drunk driver. As a result of the motor vehicle accident, client was rendered a quadriplegic and needed a life care plan.
Outcome: $9,600,000

CASE: Against Insurance company for failure to pay for property damage after a gas and fire explosion.
Outcome: $1,600,000

CASE: Medical malpractice for failure to diagnose a descending aorta aneurism, resulting in death.
Outcome: $1,300,000

CASE: Neck and back injuries from car accident. Client had ongoing symptoms and needed injections for attempted remediation of pain.
Settled for $485,000

CASE: Client was injured in a 2 vehicle collision. She suffered a traumatic brain injury, concussion and multiple injuries to the neck.
Outcome: $6,000,000

CASE: Client was in her car and was T-Boned by a commercial vehicle. Her cerebral spinal fluid leaked and she suffered a concussion and traumatic brain injury with neck and lumbar (low back) injuries. Her neck injury caused radiating pain, numbness and tingling in her arms.
Outcome: $3,400,000

CASE: Client was driving on a rural road when another car crossed the center line and caused a head-on collision in the snow and ice. Client did physical work for a living. Both knees were injured, along with a neck injury.
Outcome: $2,300,000

CASE: Client was driving on South Parker road when another vehicle rapidly changed lanes and rear-ended the client. That vehicle was cited for careless driving. The collision caused a concussion with traumatic brain Injury. Client missed time from work and had a positive correlation between brain scan and neuropsychological test results.
Outcome: $950,000

CASE: Client was rear ended by a dump truck, was then knocked forward and hit another vehicle. Client had a concussion with traumatic brain injury. Client underwent a brain scan which showed hypoperfusion, correlated with her concussion symptoms. Client suffered neck injuries and injuries to her low back.
Outcome: $650,000

CASE: Client was rear-ended. The mechanism of injury from the forces in the collision caused her neck injury and at the same time, damaged her organs inside her throat. Client had swallowing and choking issues.
Outcome: $1,250,000

CASE: Client was in a motor vehicle accident. Both injections in the neck rendered some temporary relief. The Injections were transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Surgery was recommended on the lumbar (low back). The low back was injured by the forces in the collisions.
Outcome: $933,000

CASE: The client was driving in her car and was rear-ended thereby causing injuries to her lower back and neck. Client also suffered a concussion. Client had to undergo facet injections multiple times, through multiple procedures. Client also had cognitive issues which required cognitive training and therapy.
Outcome: $400,000

CASE: Client was entering a highway from an on ramp and was rear-ended by a commercia