Roundup Attorney

We adamantly believe that those facing the fallout of exposure to the dangerous substances Roundup has chosen to use in their products deserve justice, and as a national Monsanto Roundup lawsuit attorney group, we can help you do just that. Our dedicated staff is well-versed in all of the recent litigations surrounding Round-up, including a $289 million payout awarded to a San Francisco resident who was exposed to the product. In this case, the groundskeeper in question developed Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and successfully argued that Monsanto did not do enough to warn consumers about the potential dangers their products may pose.

To understand the full scope of this issue, it’s important to note how widely used the chemicals found within Roundup are in the modern agricultural industry. They are routinely sprayed on crops across the country and are also extensively used in gardens, orchards, nurseries, and even private residences. The products produced in these settings ultimately find their way into the homes of Americans all over the country. This is an issue that has the potential to affect us all.

We have a storied legacy of pursuing justice for our clients guided by the foundational principle that all of us are entitled to a higher standard of safety when it comes to the products we utilize and consume on a daily basis. If you feel that you’ve been adversely affected as a direct result of exposure to Monsanto Roundup, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us to discuss your options. We’re always ready and willing to help.

Have You or a Loved One Been Effected by Roundup?

man grabbing a bottle fo RoundUp off of a hardware store shelf

Bell & Pollock, P.C.  for a Free, No Obligations Consultation

Roundup Diseases and Illnesses

For years now, Roundup has been linked to numerous adverse health conditions, and recently, world organizations have been warning against repeated exposure to glyphosate, the chemical component found within the product.

In fact, the Argentinian Federation of Health Professionals recently released a statement disclosing several additional risks carried by the chemical stating that “glyphosate not only causes cancer. It is also associated with increased spontaneous abortions, birth defects, skin diseases, and respiratory and neurological disease.”

New allegations point to the possibility that Monsanto may have been aware of these and other potential health hazards associated with their product lineup as far back as the 1980s. The company was the first to synthesize glyphosate, ultimately going on to patent its use in their herbicide products. While these chemical solutions were predominantly marketed to farmers and other agriculture industry workers, many of them have been commonly used in a household setting as well.

Over the last several years, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has released several new studies regarding the potential carcinogenic properties of Monsanto’s Roundup, and according to the World Health Organization-affiliated group, those findings paint the products as being probable candidates for a link to Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, as well as other cancerous diseases.

Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma is a specific form of cancer that develops within the lymphatic system. Your lymphatic system is responsible for helping your body ward off other diseases, and Lymphoma usually involves one or several tumor-like growths in or around the lymph nodes. As recently as 2017, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment announced that glyphosate will soon be added to their internal list of products known to cause cancer. While this would not incur an outright ban on sales of the Round-up in the state, it would be a clear warning to consumers about the potential dangers that they face when using it. Monsanto, for their part, are fighting this classification, stating that there is no basis for the warning and that it would negatively impact their financials. 

The Attorneys at Bell & Pollock are The Roundup Law Firm That Can Help You: Contact Us

What Can a Monsanto Roundup Lawsuit Lawyer Do to Help Me?

Our team of trained legal professionals is here to help you recoup the costs of your cancer treatment or other medical expenses related to your Roundup exposure. If you’ve developed any adverse medical conditions recently or in the past, we want to hear from you. Our goal is to provide you with all of the options at your disposal when it comes to litigation, and if necessary, execute a plan of action that will help you take control of the situation. Do keep in mind that this is a very complicated situation with lots of moving parts, so any potential litigation is likely to be a lengthy endeavor. That said, we’re committed to seeing you through to the end.

This is an extremely widespread issue that potentially affects millions of people across the globe. Roundup has been used for decades in farms and homes, and the potential damage done has not yet been adequately measured. Even if you have not yet been diagnosed with Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma or another related disease, if you’ve repeatedly been exposed to Roundup or other glyphosate-based products, we’d highly recommend consulting with a healthcare professional to considering a full health workup to ensure that there are no underlying medical issues developing as a result of your exposure.

Contact Us

Call a trusted attorney at Bell & Pollock, P.C. at (303) 795-5900 to get on the road to recovery now. You can also email our firm via the contact firm on this page.

As proud champions of the people, our lawyers are ready to answer your questions, explain the law and your rights, and help you take whatever steps necessary to recover the compensation you’re entitled to. With us in your corner, you can be confident that you have the legal support and representation necessary to successfully resolve your claim.

Don’t delay your recovery for a second longer – and don’t be misguided into thinking that you have to go through the process alone. Our attorneys are here, ready to help – and you won’t have to pay us anything until (or unless) there is a recovery in your case.

Free Legal E-Books

Click on any one of the e-books to access your free copy!

Case Results

WE KNOW HOW TO WIN

CASE: Client was injured by a drunk driver. As a result of the motor vehicle accident, client was rendered a quadriplegic and needed a life care plan.
Outcome: $9,600,000

CASE: Against Insurance company for failure to pay for property damage after a gas and fire explosion.
Outcome: $1,600,000

CASE: Medical malpractice for failure to diagnose a descending aorta aneurism, resulting in death.
Outcome: $1,300,000

CASE: Neck and back injuries from car accident. Client had ongoing symptoms and needed injections for attempted remediation of pain.
Settled for $485,000

CASE: Client was injured in a 2 vehicle collision. She suffered a traumatic brain injury, concussion and multiple injuries to the neck.
Outcome: $6,000,000

CASE: Client was in her car and was T-Boned by a commercial vehicle. Her cerebral spinal fluid leaked and she suffered a concussion and traumatic brain injury with neck and lumbar (low back) injuries. Her neck injury caused radiating pain, numbness and tingling in her arms.
Outcome: $3,400,000

CASE: Client was driving on a rural road when another car crossed the center line and caused a head-on collision in the snow and ice. Client did physical work for a living. Both knees were injured, along with a neck injury.
Outcome: $2,300,000

CASE: Client was driving on South Parker road when another vehicle rapidly changed lanes and rear-ended the client. That vehicle was cited for careless driving. The collision caused a concussion with traumatic brain Injury. Client missed time from work and had a positive correlation between brain scan and neuropsychological test results.
Outcome: $950,000

CASE: Client was rear ended by a dump truck, was then knocked forward and hit another vehicle. Client had a concussion with traumatic brain injury. Client underwent a brain scan which showed hypoperfusion, correlated with her concussion symptoms. Client suffered neck injuries and injuries to her low back.
Outcome: $650,000

CASE: Client was rear-ended. The mechanism of injury from the forces in the collision caused her neck injury and at the same time, damaged her organs inside her throat. Client had swallowing and choking issues.
Outcome: $1,250,000

CASE: Client was in a motor vehicle accident. Both injections in the neck rendered some temporary relief. The Injections were transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Surgery was recommended on the lumbar (low back). The low back was injured by the forces in the collisions.
Outcome: $933,000

CASE: The client was driving in her car and was rear-ended thereby causing injuries to her lower back and neck. Client also suffered a concussion. Client had to undergo facet injections multiple times, through multiple procedures. Client also had cognitive issues which required cognitive training and therapy.
Outcome: $400,000

CASE: Client was entering a highway from an on ramp and was rear-ended by a commercial van. Client tested positive for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome and failed conservative treatment. Client underwent thoracic outlet syndrome surgey, which involved removal of the first rib to attempt to relieve pressure in the thoracic outlet. Client also suffered a back injury.
Outcome: $750,000

CASE: Client was injured by a drunk driver, who crossed the center line of the road. Client underwent multiple surgeries and could not work. Client was late 40s and needed a modified life care plan.
Outcome: $750,000

CASE: Client was rear ended by a tow truck driver who was a diabetic. The diabetic at fault party was a non-compliant diabetic and claimed he had a syncope episode, and was “blacked out”. Client had a preexisting back condition known and the forces from the collision aggravated, or made worse, the preexisting back condition in addition to, causing neck injuries.
Outcome: $350,000

CASE: Client was a passenger in a car where the driver fell asleep on a country road in the early morning hours. The car rolled multiple times. Client had eye injuries, facial injuries and neck and knee injuries.
Outcome: $850,000

CASE: Client was on the job, driving her own car, when she was rear-ended. She suffered a concussion with traumatic brain injury and pursued Workers Compensation Claim.
Outcome: $150,000

CASE: Client slipped and fell on snow and ice in Central City. He suffered back injuries, that did not require injections.
Outcome: $125,000

CASE: Client slipped and fell on snow and ice on a sidewalk in front of a business. She had to have knee surgery and multiple injections in her back.
Outcome: $175,000

CASE: Client was visiting a friend who was renting a house. Client tripped on untreated, dangerous section of deck and injured his back.
Outcome: $150,000

CASE:Client was rear ended and needed fusion spinal surgery. Insurance proceeds were limited.
Outcome: $125,000

CASE:Client was rear-ended and had to have rotator cuff surgery. Insurance proceeds were limited.
Settled for $65,000

CASE:Client was at Denver International Aiport traveling through Denver, slipped and fell and broke her ankle.
Settled for $118,750

CASE:Client was exposed to mold in a multi-family dwelling that was caused by leaking water.
Settled for $125,000

CASE:Motorcycle accident, reconstructive surgery, post-traumatic stress disorder, neurological injuries
Settled for $1,275,000

Testimonials

CLIENTS APPRECIATE US

I could not have made a better decision than to call Bell & Pollock with my case. Dana Miller and her team were the best.
Brian B.
THEY WERE VERY PROFESSIONAL, KEPT ME INFORMED AND DID WHAT I WOULD CALL A SPECTACULAR JOB- THEY SEEM TO PREACH “LEGAL GAME PLAN” AND EVEN WROTE A BOOK ABOUT IT- IT BASICALLY MEANS THEY HAVE STRATEGIES FOR YOU AND YOUR CASE AND I MEAN EVERYTHING WAS SOUND AND ANALYZED.
Jason H.
I appreciate brad and his team the bell and Pollock attorneys are by far the best ones i have ever worked with.
Aliviya D.
Brad Pollock is educated, experienced, and is the world’s greatest attorney. Marlena Elsloo helps him focus in on the most important issues.
Kathy T.
He is very professional and we would recommend Mr. Bell to anyone who is looking for an attorney.
Dianna C.
He was kind, compassionate and knowledgeable, but also tenacious when working with the insurance companies.
Michelle K.
I was blessed to be put in contact with Dana, who not only provided me free feedback and counsel when we spoke on the phone, but also took the time to call me back on multiple occasions to check on me.Dana Miller, you are a sweet, caring and amazing person and I appreciate all your help.
Grady C.