Roundup FAQ

Do you have questions about Monsanto’s controversial weed killer, Roundup? If so, you’ve come to the right place. In this FAQ on current Roundup class-action lawsuits, we’ll take a look at several of the most commonly asked questions regarding this product and its potentially dangerous chemical properties. Several Roundup lawsuits have been in full swing for months now, and if you think you may have a case, don’t delay. Reach out to us today to discuss your options.

What Is Monsanto Roundup?

Monsanto’s Roundup product is an herbicide designed by the company in the early 1970s to be particularly effective at managing and eliminating common varieties of weeds. The primary active ingredient found within Roundup is glyphosate. This chemical was first synthesized by the company itself, who patented it shortly afterward and has been marketing it as Roundup since 1973.

Colorado gardener pouring a capful of RoundUp in the garden

Monsanto’s flagship product has landed the company in legal hot water due to its apparent connection to various forms of cancer. These accusations have already cost the company dearly, culminating in a $289 million lawsuit, and a 2018 acquisition by Bayer, who is currently attempting to clean up the company’s public image. All the same, new class-action lawsuits are brewing, and if you think you may have been affected by Roundup, you may have a viable case for litigation.

Have You or a Loved One Been Effected by Roundup? Contact

Bell & Pollock, P.C.  for a Free, No Obligations Consultation

What Injuries/Illnesses Are the Basis for The Roundup Claim?

Health issues associated with Monsanto Roundup have been accumulating for years, but only now is the company actually beginning to take (public) notice. As mentioned above, one high-profile lawsuit that concluded in 2018 awarded a San Francisco groundskeeper $289 million after he successfully argued that Monsanto did not provide adequate warning about the potential risk of using their herbicidal products containing glyphosate.

The main risks being brought up in litigation involve the carcinogenic properties of glyphosate as disclosed recently by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). This reclassification is based upon the organization’s findings that exposure to glyphosate may cause cancerous growth over an extended period of time, and that this risk has not been adequately communicated to the public.

Who Has a Case?

Anyone who has ever come into contact with herbicide products from Monsanto containing glyphosate has been exposed. In fact, you may have been exposed to it in small amounts by merely ingesting foods that have been treated by Roundup or other, similar herbicides. More and more litigation cases are beginning to appear along these lines, and we expect this trend to continue well into 2019.


The Attorneys at Bell & Pollock are The Roundup Law Firm That Can Help You: Contact Us

How Do I Know If I Have a Case?

Have you come into contact with Monsanto Roundup or any other herbicide in the company’s roster containing glyphosate since 1980? Have you ingested any food products in that time that may have been linked to the chemical? If the answer to either question is yes, you may have a viable case for legal action against the company. However, the most likely candidates for litigation will be individuals that have suffered medical illnesses or injury as a result of their exposure.

For instance, if you’ve developed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma or Chronic Lymphatic Leukemia as a result of your exposure to Monsanto Roundup or a similar herbicide, you are a prime candidate for taking legal action against the company. In a recent statement, the Argentinian Federation of Health Professionals expressed that, “glyphosate not only causes cancer. It is also associated with increased spontaneous abortions, birth defects, skin diseases, and respiratory and neurological disease.”

Who Do I Call If I Think I Have a Case?

If you feel that you meet any of the requirements stated above, don’t hesitate to reach out to us today. As a national Roundup attorney group, we have access to the latest legal methods available, and we will do everything in our power to help you reach a settlement for your injuries and illnesses associated with Monsanto’s products. Remember, litigation is open to any individual who may have experience potential health hazards as a result of their exposure, either direct or indirect, to Roundup or any other glyphosate-based herbicidal product.

Don’t delay. New cases are popping up around the country, and there are still many opportunities to build your case. Before reaching out to us, collect any relevant information you may have, such as hospital records, product receipts, and descriptions of your specific situation, including the length of exposure, how you were exposed, and any other adverse health conditions you have experience as a result. We look forward to assisting you.

Call (720) 613 – 6736 or
contact our firm for a FREE consultation.

Contact Us

Call a trusted attorney at Bell & Pollock, P.C. at (303) 795-5900 to get on the road to recovery now. You can also email our firm via the contact firm on this page.

As proud champions of the people, our lawyers are ready to answer your questions, explain the law and your rights, and help you take whatever steps necessary to recover the compensation you’re entitled to. With us in your corner, you can be confident that you have the legal support and representation necessary to successfully resolve your claim.

Don’t delay your recovery for a second longer – and don’t be misguided into thinking that you have to go through the process alone. Our attorneys are here, ready to help – and you won’t have to pay us anything until (or unless) there is a recovery in your case.

Free Legal E-Books

Click on any one of the e-books to access your free copy!

Case Results


CASE: Client was injured by a drunk driver. As a result of the motor vehicle accident, client was rendered a quadriplegic and needed a life care plan.
Outcome: $9,600,000

CASE: Against Insurance company for failure to pay for property damage after a gas and fire explosion.
Outcome: $1,600,000

CASE: Medical malpractice for failure to diagnose a descending aorta aneurism, resulting in death.
Outcome: $1,300,000

CASE: Neck and back injuries from car accident. Client had ongoing symptoms and needed injections for attempted remediation of pain.
Settled for $485,000

CASE: Client was injured in a 2 vehicle collision. She suffered a traumatic brain injury, concussion and multiple injuries to the neck.
Outcome: $6,000,000

CASE: Client was in her car and was T-Boned by a commercial vehicle. Her cerebral spinal fluid leaked and she suffered a concussion and traumatic brain injury with neck and lumbar (low back) injuries. Her neck injury caused radiating pain, numbness and tingling in her arms.
Outcome: $3,400,000

CASE: Client was driving on a rural road when another car crossed the center line and caused a head-on collision in the snow and ice. Client did physical work for a living. Both knees were injured, along with a neck injury.
Outcome: $2,300,000

CASE: Client was driving on South Parker road when another vehicle rapidly changed lanes and rear-ended the client. That vehicle was cited for careless driving. The collision caused a concussion with traumatic brain Injury. Client missed time from work and had a positive correlation between brain scan and neuropsychological test results.
Outcome: $950,000

CASE: Client was rear ended by a dump truck, was then knocked forward and hit another vehicle. Client had a concussion with traumatic brain injury. Client underwent a brain scan which showed hypoperfusion, correlated with her concussion symptoms. Client suffered neck injuries and injuries to her low back.
Outcome: $650,000

CASE: Client was rear-ended. The mechanism of injury from the forces in the collision caused her neck injury and at the same time, damaged her organs inside her throat. Client had swallowing and choking issues.
Outcome: $1,250,000

CASE: Client was in a motor vehicle accident. Both injections in the neck rendered some temporary relief. The Injections were transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Surgery was recommended on the lumbar (low back). The low back was injured by the forces in the collisions.
Outcome: $933,000

CASE: The client was driving in her car and was rear-ended thereby causing injuries to her lower back and neck. Client also suffered a concussion. Client had to undergo facet injections multiple times, through multiple procedures. Client also had cognitive issues which required cognitive training and therapy.
Outcome: $400,000

CASE: Client was entering a highway from an on ramp and was rear-ended by a commercial van. Client tested positive for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome and failed conservative treatment. Client underwent thoracic outlet syndrome surgey, which involved removal of the first rib to attempt to relieve pressure in the thoracic outlet. Client also suffered a back injury.
Outcome: $750,000

CASE: Client was injured by a drunk driver, who crossed the center line of the road. Client underwent multiple surgeries and could not work. Client was late 40s and needed a modified life care plan.
Outcome: $750,000

CASE: Client was rear ended by a tow truck driver who was a diabetic. The diabetic at fault party was a non-compliant diabetic and claimed he had a syncope episode, and was “blacked out”. Client had a preexisting back condition known and the forces from the collision aggravated, or made worse, the preexisting back condition in addition to, causing neck injuries.
Outcome: $350,000

CASE: Client was a passenger in a car where the driver fell asleep on a country road in the early morning hours. The car rolled multiple times. Client had eye injuries, facial injuries and neck and knee injuries.
Outcome: $850,000

CASE: Client was on the job, driving her own car, when she was rear-ended. She suffered a concussion with traumatic brain injury and pursued Workers Compensation Claim.
Outcome: $150,000

CASE: Client slipped and fell on snow and ice in Central City. He suffered back injuries, that did not require injections.
Outcome: $125,000

CASE: Client slipped and fell on snow and ice on a sidewalk in front of a business. She had to have knee surgery and multiple injections in her back.
Outcome: $175,000

CASE: Client was visiting a friend who was renting a house. Client tripped on untreated, dangerous section of deck and injured his back.
Outcome: $150,000

CASE:Client was rear ended and needed fusion spinal surgery. Insurance proceeds were limited.
Outcome: $125,000

CASE:Client was rear-ended and had to have rotator cuff surgery. Insurance proceeds were limited.
Settled for $65,000

CASE:Client was at Denver International Aiport traveling through Denver, slipped and fell and broke her ankle.
Settled for $118,750

CASE:Client was exposed to mold in a multi-family dwelling that was caused by leaking water.
Settled for $125,000

CASE:Motorcycle accident, reconstructive surgery, post-traumatic stress disorder, neurological injuries
Settled for $1,275,000



I could not have made a better decision than to call Bell & Pollock with my case. Dana Miller and her team were the best.
Brian B.
Jason H.
I appreciate brad and his team the bell and Pollock attorneys are by far the best ones i have ever worked with.
Aliviya D.
Brad Pollock is educated, experienced, and is the world’s greatest attorney. Marlena Elsloo helps him focus in on the most important issues.
Kathy T.
He is very professional and we would recommend Mr. Bell to anyone who is looking for an attorney.
Dianna C.
He was kind, compassionate and knowledgeable, but also tenacious when working with the insurance companies.
Michelle K.
I was blessed to be put in contact with Dana, who not only provided me free feedback and counsel when we spoke on the phone, but also took the time to call me back on multiple occasions to check on me.Dana Miller, you are a sweet, caring and amazing person and I appreciate all your help.
Grady C.