As current trucking regulations sit, trucking companies are required to drug test drivers during the hiring process via urine tests that screen for at least five different classes of drugs. This drug testing can also be conducted by trucking companies where there is reason to suspect that a driver may be impaired by drugs while on duty or driving a company vehicle (because, for instance, the driver was involved in a truck accident).

A debate regarding the use of hair drug testing for truckers in heating up in Congress, a Denver truck accident attorney explains. Here’s more on this debate.

A debate regarding the use of hair drug testing for truckers in heating up in Congress, a Denver truck accident attorney explains. Here’s more on this debate.

Despite the fact that urinalysis for drugs can determine whether drivers may have been using narcotics within days (or sometimes weeks) of their drug use, depending on the type and amount of drugs, these tests have some problems, the American Trucking Association (ATA) has recently pointed out.

Namely, urine drug tests fail to indicate whether people may be chronic drug users, opening up the risk that people will dry out for a few days to pass a test and then start using once they gain employment.

That is the driving force behind the ATA’s recent request to Congress to allow for hair drug testing (in place of urine testing) in the trucking industry. As ATA President Bill Graves explained in a letter to Congress:

ATA is aware of thousands of truck drivers who have tested positive for illegal drug use on hair tests and have obtained driving positions with other carriers because they were subsequently able to pass DOT-required urine tests… Several of these drivers have had crashes and, of course, future ones are likely as a result.

Graves went on to explain that:

Hair testing is a validated, proven and effective method for detecting illegal drug use that has been widely embraced by private industry and many governments worldwide… Congress should remove impediments to the adoption of hair testing by trucking companies that follow industry standards . . . Moreover, Congress should reject efforts to protect the employment of drivers whose drug use might otherwise go undetected.

Some Labor Groups & Trucking Companies Oppose Hair Drug Tests for Truckers

On the opposite side of this debate are labor groups and some trucking companies who contend that allowing hair drug testing may create an inherent bias against certain workers. Specifically, the officials at the Transportation Trades Department of the AFL-CIO have explained in a letter to Congress that:

It is widely known that hair specimen can test positive for a drug that its donor was merely exposed to but never actually ingested.

Studies also show that hair testing may have an inherent racial bias, as darker and more porous hair retains drugs at greater rates than lighter hair… And recently, a federal court of appeals held that Boston police officers subject to hair testing for illegal drugs had proven, ‘beyond reasonable dispute,’ a prima facie case that the testing program caused a disparate impact on the basis of race in violation of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Where do you stand on this issue? Post your opinions on our Facebook & Google+ pages.

Contact an Experienced Denver Truck Accident Attorney at Bell & Pollock, P.C.

If you have been injured in a truck accident, you can turn to a Denver truck accident attorney at Bell & Pollock, P.C. for experienced help advocating your rights and pursuing justice.

To find out more about how we can help you, call us at (303) 795-5900 or email our firm using the contact form on this page to schedule a free initial consultation with one of our lawyers. During this meeting, you will receive clear, honest legal advice about your case, your rights and your best options for moving forward.

Contact Us

Call a trusted attorney at Bell & Pollock, P.C. at (303) 795-5900 to get on the road to recovery now. You can also email our firm via the contact firm on this page.

As proud champions of the people, our lawyers are ready to answer your questions, explain the law and your rights, and help you take whatever steps necessary to recover the compensation you’re entitled to. With us in your corner, you can be confident that you have the legal support and representation necessary to successfully resolve your claim.

Don’t delay your recovery for a second longer – and don’t be misguided into thinking that you have to go through the process alone. Our attorneys are here, ready to help – and you won’t have to pay us anything until (or unless) there is a recovery in your case.

You may confidentially submit your question and it will be answered by Bell & Pollock, P.C. The only little catch is that he does this as a public service and he's going to give you some general advice only. This does not make you a client of Bell & Pollock, P.C. There is no charge for this service.

Free Legal E-Books

Click on any one of the e-books to access your free copy!

Case Results


CASE: Client was injured by a drunk driver. As a result of the motor vehicle accident, client was rendered a quadriplegic and needed a life care plan.
Outcome: $9,600,000

CASE: Against Insurance company for failure to pay for property damage after a gas and fire explosion.
Outcome: $1,600,000

CASE: Medical malpractice for failure to diagnose a descending aorta aneurism, resulting in death.
Outcome: $1,300,000

CASE: Neck and back injuries from car accident. Client had ongoing symptoms and needed injections for attempted remediation of pain.
Settled for $485,000

CASE: Client was injured in a 2 vehicle collision. She suffered a traumatic brain injury, concussion and multiple injuries to the neck.
Outcome: $6,000,000

CASE: Client was in her car and was T-Boned by a commercial vehicle. Her cerebral spinal fluid leaked and she suffered a concussion and traumatic brain injury with neck and lumbar (low back) injuries. Her neck injury caused radiating pain, numbness and tingling in her arms.
Outcome: $3,400,000

CASE: Client was driving on a rural road when another car crossed the center line and caused a head-on collision in the snow and ice. Client did physical work for a living. Both knees were injured, along with a neck injury.
Outcome: $2,300,000

CASE: Client was driving on South Parker road when another vehicle rapidly changed lanes and rear-ended the client. That vehicle was cited for careless driving. The collision caused a concussion with traumatic brain Injury. Client missed time from work and had a positive correlation between brain scan and neuropsychological test results.
Outcome: $950,000</