As our population grows, so do the number of drivers on the roads in the United States. In fact, it is estimated that there will be 60 million adults driving by the years 2030. Obviously, the government could find reason to put restrictions in place making it harder for elderly folks to continue to drive, but there would definitely be a backlash from the legal community.

“We believe that driving is about the ability and health of the driver, not their age,” said AARP spokeswoman Kristin S. Palmer. “We can’t stereotype older drivers.”

Reasons Against Imposing Restrictions on Older Drivers

Will the US Govt Put More Restrictions on Older Drivers? | Denver Car Accident Attorney

Will the US Govt Put More Restrictions on Older Drivers? | Denver Car Accident Attorney

The following are some good reasons for not imposing restrictions on older drivers:

  • Firstly, older people are more apt to galvanize and vote against certain types of restrictions, if they become burdensome to their constituents.
  • Groups such as AARP and AAA are huge advocates for seniors, and both groups argue that older drivers shouldn’t be discriminated against, based solely on age.
  • Likewise, state legislatures have become less inclined to restrict driver’s licenses or impose additional requirements for seniors. For instance, requiring additional vision or driving tests just based on age groups.
  • Studies have shown older drivers are safer than most age groups.
  • Legislation aimed at restricting older people from driving is not a popular undertaking and most often gets voted down for fear of political backlash from organized groups of voters and lobbying groups.

Risks & Reality of an Aging Driving Force

As a nation, we are positioned to see more senior drivers than ever as 75 million baby boomers age. Back in the 1970s, a little more than half of Americans over the age of 65 drove. Today, that number is well over 84 percent. The reality is there is an aging population of motorists that experience degraded capabilities, such as:

  • Vision is a big skill that most people see degraded over time.
  • Hearing also degrades over time in some people.
  • Reflexes are not as quick as they once were in older people.

Unfortunately, seniors are at a higher risk of a car accident than middle-aged drivers. This is due to declining vision, hearing and cognitive abilities as well as

Contact an Experienced Denver Car Accident Attorney at Bell & Pollock, P.C.

Have you been injured in a car accident with a senior? If so, you can turn to a trusted Colorado crash lawyer at Bell & Pollock, P.C. for an experienced advocate who will be compassionate and caring, yet fight for rights while pursuing justice.

At Bell & Pollock, our attorneys leverage combined experience and a winning track record of helping clients recover restitution for personal injuries and other damages. Since 1984, our legal team has taken on big and small cases alike, but always aggressively litigating those cases for the best possible outcomes.

To learn more about how our legal services can assist you, call us at (303) 795-5900 or email our firm using the contact form on this page to schedule a free initial consultation with one of our attorneys. We’re conveniently located in Denver, Greenwood Village, and Steamboat Springs to provide you the highest quality legal services as well as throughout the rest of the Denver metro area and the state of Colorado.

Contact Us

Call a trusted attorney at Bell & Pollock, P.C. at (303) 795-5900 to get on the road to recovery now. You can also email our firm via the contact firm on this page.

As proud champions of the people, our lawyers are ready to answer your questions, explain the law and your rights, and help you take whatever steps necessary to recover the compensation you’re entitled to. With us in your corner, you can be confident that you have the legal support and representation necessary to successfully resolve your claim.

Don’t delay your recovery for a second longer – and don’t be misguided into thinking that you have to go through the process alone. Our attorneys are here, ready to help – and you won’t have to pay us anything until (or unless) there is a recovery in your case.

You may confidentially submit your question and it will be answered by Bell & Pollock, P.C. The only little catch is that he does this as a public service and he's going to give you some general advice only. This does not make you a client of Bell & Pollock, P.C. There is no charge for this service.
 
 
captcha

Free Legal E-Books

Click on any one of the e-books to access your free copy!

Case Results

WE KNOW HOW TO WIN

CASE: Client was injured by a drunk driver. As a result of the motor vehicle accident, client was rendered a quadriplegic and needed a life care plan.
Outcome: $9,600,000

CASE: Against Insurance company for failure to pay for property damage after a gas and fire explosion.
Outcome: $1,600,000

CASE: Medical malpractice for failure to diagnose a descending aorta aneurism, resulting in death.
Outcome: $1,300,000

CASE: Neck and back injuries from car accident. Client had ongoing symptoms and needed injections for attempted remediation of pain.
Settled for $485,000

CASE: Client was injured in a 2 vehicle collision. She suffered a traumatic brain injury, concussion and multiple injuries to the neck.
Outcome: $6,000,000

CASE: Client was in her car and was T-Boned by a commercial vehicle. Her cerebral spinal fluid leaked and she suffered a concussion and traumatic brain injury with neck and lumbar (low back) injuries. Her neck injury caused radiating pain, numbness and tingling in her arms.
Outcome: $3,400,000

CASE: Client was driving on a rural road when another car crossed the center line and caused a head-on collision in the snow and ice. Client did physical work for a living. Both knees were injured, along with a neck injury.
Outcome: $2,300,000

CASE: Client was driving on South Parker road when another vehicle rapidly changed lanes and rear-ended the client. That vehicle was cited for careless driving. The collision caused a concussion with traumatic brain Injury. Client missed time from work and had a positive correlation between brain scan and neuropsychological test results.
Outcome: $950,000

CASE: Client was rear ended by a dump truck, was then knocked forward and hit another vehicle. Client had a c