mean girls cyber bullying another girl

Cyberbullying in Colorado

Cyberbullying involves inflicting emotional pain and humiliation upon another person, or group of people, using technology. Kids and adults can send cruel or harassing text messages, post embarrassing information or rumors on social media, or make vile comments in an online forum.

Cyberbullying is dangerous because, unlike traditional bullying, harassment is ongoing. Technology allows bullies to follow their targets everywhere. There is no escape. Anytime a victim has access to technology, they can be cyberbullied.

Social media breeds easy opportunities for harassment. It is now becoming a part of daily their lives. Yet, young people are becoming desensitized to it. When this happens, it becomes even more difficult for the culture of cruelty to change, and cyberbullying remains constant.

Additionally, because cyberbullies cannot see or feel the impact of their words or images, they often are much crueler online because they have an empathetic barrier in place, a veil of sorts. For instance, they can be emotionally detached from what they are doing because they can’t see facial cues or body language from reactions.

Examples of cyberbullying:

  • Harassing someone online by shaming, embarrassing, demeaning, or humiliating them
  • Impersonating someone online
  • Making threats to physically harm another person
  • Threatening to kill someone
  • Posting or texting something obscene
  • Engaging in sexting either by sending photos or videos or by requesting them
  • Extorting someone sexually (sometimes called sextortion)
  • Stalking someone digitally
  • Posting, watching or requesting child pornography
  • Committing hate crimes based on race, gender, sexual orientation or religion Taking and/or posting a photo of someone when they expect privacy (like locker rooms and bathrooms)

Cyberbullying and the Law

There are some legal consequences for cyberbullying.

For example, a person who sends or receive sexts can be charged with distributing child pornography. What’s more, if the person in the photograph took the photo themselves and then distributed it, they can be charged with distributing child pornography if they are a minor.


Colorado anti-bullying laws and regulations include the following definition of bullying:

“Bullying” means any written or oral expression, or physical or electronic act or gesture, or a pattern thereof, that is intended to coerce, intimidate, or cause any physical, mental, or emotional harm to any student. Bullying is prohibited against any student for any reason, including but not limited to any such behavior that is directed toward a student on the basis of the student’s academic performance or against whom federal and state laws prohibit discrimination upon any of the bases described in section 22-32-109 (1)(11)(I)(A). This definition is not intended to infringe upon any right guaranteed to any person by the first amendment to the United States constitution or to prevent the expression of any religious, political, or philosophical views. Colo. Rev. Stat. §22-32 109.1 (2020).

Cyberbullying is typically addressed through harassment laws. For example, someone can be prosecuted for cyberbullying by violating harassment laws. Typically, a misdemeanor.

However, there has been a significant change in Colorado Revised Statutes §18-9-111(1)(e), Criminal Code, Article 9 – Offenses Against Public Peace, Order, and Decency, Harassment – Kiana Arellano’s law.

This statute states “(1) A person commits harassment if, with intent to harass, annoy, or alarm another person, he or she: (e) Directly or indirectly initiates communication with a person or directs language toward another person, anonymously or otherwise, by telephone, telephone network, data network, text message, instant message, computer, computer network, computer system, or other interactive electronic medium in a manner intended to harass or threaten bodily injury or property damage, or makes any comment, request, suggestion, or proposal by telephone, computer, computer network, computer system, or other interactive electronic medium that is obscene; or (f) Makes a telephone call or causes a telephone to ring repeatedly, whether or not a conversation ensues, with no purpose of legitimate conversation; or (g) Makes repeated communications at inconvenient hours that invade the privacy of another and interfere in the use and enjoyment of another’s home or private residence or other private property; or (h) Repeatedly insults, taunts, challenges, or makes communications in offensively coarse language to, another in a manner likely to provoke a violent or disorderly response.”

On March 28, 2022, the Colorado Supreme Court in People v. Moreno, held that the phrase “intended to harass” was unconstitutional for being overbroad and impermissibly restricting to protected speech.

In this case, an ex-husband was emailing his ex-wife disparaging and vulgar comments and posting these comments on Facebook. The Court decided to strike “intend to harass” because the words “harass” and “intended to harass” are so broad that they cover protected speech, and in the digital age blocking or deleting with a swipe of the finger in terms of unwanted electronic communications is a small price to pay for the freedom of speech.


Although there is no federal law that specifically addresses cyberbullying, if someone is cyberbullied because of race, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, disability, or religion, it may overlap with discriminatory harassment and federal civil rights laws. Many cyberbullying cases get prosecuted as harassment. Some of the cases end up in civil court. Others might warrant criminal charges and prosecution for hate crimes, impersonation, harassment, and violations under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA).

What Can I Do If I Was a Victim of Cyberbullying?

  • Notify police or school security,
  • Talk with a trusted adult or teacher,
  • Inform your parents/guardians, and
  • Contact a lawyer if other avenues have not been successful.

The Future of Cyberbullying and the Law

There have been a number of high-profile cyberbullying cases in the news where offenders have faced criminal charges.

One of the most significant of these cases involves a 17-year-old Massachusetts teen who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter for texting her 18-year-old boyfriend, urging him to continue along with his plan to commit suicide (now a series on Hulu). As he was pumping carbon monoxide into his car in a store parking lot, he got out when he started to feel ill. Instead of supporting his decision, the 17-year-old girlfriend texted him telling him he needed to get back in the truck and follow through with his plan. She also did not call the police or his family and made no efforts to stop him. Consequently, a Massachusetts judge found her guilty of involuntary manslaughter.

In Colorado, Schools have statutes that they must abide by. For example, § 22-93 106. School bullying prevention and education–availability of best practices and other resources: (1) On or before November 1, 2011, the department shall create a page on its public website at which the department shall continuously make publicly available evidence-based best practices and other resources for educators and other professionals engaged in bullying prevention and education. (2) The department shall solicit evidence-based best practices and other resources from the school safety resource center created in section 24-33.5-1803, C.R.S.; from school districts; from the state charter school institute established in section 22 30.5-503; and from other state and federal agencies that are concerned with school bullying prevention and education. The department shall review materials that it receives and, as may be appropriate, make such materials available to the public on the website described in subsection (1) of this section.

As schools, communities, and law enforcement become more proficient at identifying cyberbullying, cases may increase. Parents are often pushed to inform and educate as well. They may need to be more diligent about digital literacy and etiquette. Meanwhile, kids need to realize that if they are angry or feeling emotional, that posting about it will not lead to good things. Likewise, venting should be done to a trusted friend or in a private journal.

Contact Us

Call a trusted attorney at Bell & Pollock, P.C. at (303) 795-5900 to get on the road to recovery now. You can also email our firm via the contact firm on this page.

As proud champions of the people, our lawyers are ready to answer your questions, explain the law and your rights, and help you take whatever steps necessary to recover the compensation you’re entitled to. With us in your corner, you can be confident that you have the legal support and representation necessary to successfully resolve your claim.

Don’t delay your recovery for a second longer – and don’t be misguided into thinking that you have to go through the process alone. Our attorneys are here, ready to help – and you won’t have to pay us anything until (or unless) there is a recovery in your case.

Free Legal E-Books

Click on any one of the e-books to access your free copy!

Case Results


CASE: Client was injured by a drunk driver. As a result of the motor vehicle accident, client was rendered a quadriplegic and needed a life care plan.
Outcome: $9,600,000

CASE: Against Insurance company for failure to pay for property damage after a gas and fire explosion.
Outcome: $1,600,000

CASE: Medical malpractice for failure to diagnose a descending aorta aneurism, resulting in death.
Outcome: $1,300,000

CASE: Neck and back injuries from car accident. Client had ongoing symptoms and needed injections for attempted remediation of pain.
Settled for $485,000

CASE: Client was injured in a 2 vehicle collision. She suffered a traumatic brain injury, concussion and multiple injuries to the neck.
Outcome: $6,000,000

CASE: Client was in her car and was T-Boned by a commercial vehicle. Her cerebral spinal fluid leaked and she suffered a concussion and traumatic brain injury with neck and lumbar (low back) injuries. Her neck injury caused radiating pain, numbness and tingling in her arms.
Outcome: $3,400,000

CASE: Client was driving on a rural road when another car crossed the center line and caused a head-on collision in the snow and ice. Client did physical work for a living. Both knees were injured, along with a neck injury.
Outcome: $2,300,000

CASE: Client was driving on South Parker road when another vehicle rapidly changed lanes and rear-ended the client. That vehicle was cited for careless driving. The collision caused a concussion with traumatic brain Injury. Client missed time from work and had a positive correlation between brain scan and neuropsychological test results.
Outcome: $950,000

CASE: Client was rear ended by a dump truck, was then knocked forward and hit another vehicle. Client had a concussion with traumatic brain injury. Client underwent a brain scan which showed hypoperfusion, correlated with her concussion symptoms. Client suffered neck injuries and injuries to her low back.
Outcome: $650,000

CASE: Client was rear-ended. The mechanism of injury from the forces in the collision caused her neck injury and at the same time, damaged her organs inside her throat. Client had swallowing and choking issues.
Outcome: $1,250,000

CASE: Client was in a motor vehicle accident. Both injections in the neck rendered some temporary relief. The Injections were transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Surgery was recommended on the lumbar (low back). The low back was injured by the forces in the collisions.
Outcome: $933,000

CASE: The client was driving in her car and was rear-ended thereby causing injuries to her lower back and neck. Client also suffered a concussion. Client had to undergo facet injections multiple times, through multiple procedures. Client also had cognitive issues which required cognitive training and therapy.
Outcome: $400,000

CASE: Client was entering a highway from an on ramp and was rear-ended by a commercial van. Client tested positive for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome and failed conservative treatment. Client underwent thoracic outlet syndrome surgey, which involved removal of the first rib to attempt to relieve pressure in the thoracic outlet. Client also suffered a back injury.
Outcome: $750,000

CASE: Client was injured by a drunk driver, who crossed the center line of the road. Client underwent multiple surgeries and could not work. Client was late 40s and needed a modified life care plan.
Outcome: $750,000

CASE: Client was rear ended by a tow truck driver who was a diabetic. The diabetic at fault party was a non-compliant diabetic and claimed he had a syncope episode, and was “blacked out”. Client had a preexisting back condition known and the forces from the collision aggravated, or made worse, the preexisting back condition in addition to, causing neck injuries.
Outcome: $350,000

CASE: Client was a passenger in a car where the driver fell asleep on a country road in the early morning hours. The car rolled multiple times. Client had eye injuries, facial injuries and neck and knee injuries.
Outcome: $850,000

CASE: Client was on the job, driving her own car, when she was rear-ended. She suffered a concussion with traumatic brain injury and pursued Workers Compensation Claim.
Outcome: $150,000

CASE: Client slipped and fell on snow and ice in Central City. He suffered back injuries, that did not require injections.
Outcome: $125,000

CASE: Client slipped and fell on snow and ice on a sidewalk in front of a business. She had to have knee surgery and multiple injections in her back.
Outcome: $175,000

CASE: Client was visiting a friend who was renting a house. Client tripped on untreated, dangerous section of deck and injured his back.
Outcome: $150,000

CASE:Client was rear ended and needed fusion spinal surgery. Insurance proceeds were limited.
Outcome: $125,000

CASE:Client was rear-ended and had to have rotator cuff surgery. Insurance proceeds were limited.
Settled for $65,000

CASE:Client was at Denver International Aiport traveling through Denver, slipped and fell and broke her ankle.
Settled for $118,750

CASE:Client was exposed to mold in a multi-family dwelling that was caused by leaking water.
Settled for $125,000

CASE:Motorcycle accident, reconstructive surgery, post-traumatic stress disorder, neurological injuries
Settled for $1,275,000



I could not have made a better decision than to call Bell & Pollock with my case. Dana Miller and her team were the best.
Brian B.
Jason H.
I appreciate brad and his team the bell and Pollock attorneys are by far the best ones i have ever worked with.
Aliviya D.
Brad Pollock is educated, experienced, and is the world's greatest attorney. Marlena Elsloo helps him focus in on the most important issues.
Kathy T.
He is very professional and we would recommend Mr. Bell to anyone who is looking for an attorney.
Dianna C.
He was kind, compassionate and knowledgeable, but also tenacious when working with the insurance companies.
Michelle K.
I was blessed to be put in contact with Dana, who not only provided me free feedback and counsel when we spoke on the phone, but also took the time to call me back on multiple occasions to check on me.Dana Miller, you are a sweet, caring and amazing person and I appreciate all your help.
Grady C.